Former CIA director Michael Hayden’s controversial remark has ignited a firestorm of criticism and calls for accountability. Senator Tommy Tuberville, known for his principled stance against specific military policies, was a target of Hayden’s verbal threat.
Tuberville’s Stand on Military Policy
Understanding the context is helpful. Senator Tuberville’s opposition to the, as he calls it, Pentagon’s “illegal abortion policy” and his refusal to approve military nominations en masse set the stage for the events that followed.
The Pentagon’s Controversial Abortion Policy
The controversial Department of Defense policy, which allowed taxpayer funds to be used for abortions in the military, became a point of contention for Senator Tuberville and many others who deemed it an overreach of DoD authority.
The Power of Senatorial Privilege
Tuberville invoked the senatorial privilege to withhold consent for military nominations as a means of pressuring the Pentagon to reconsider its policy, emphasizing the importance of government oversight.
Hayden’s Spooky Suggestion
Michael Hayden’s response, in which he suggested Tuberville should possibly be removed from ‘the human race’ to a question on social media about Tuberville’s committee membership raised eyebrows. Many interpreted it as a call for violence or assassination, which sparked immediate backlash.
Online Backlash
Hayden’s comment triggered a wave of backlash online, with individuals from various political backgrounds condemning his remark and expressing concern about its implications.
The Call for Accountability
Many users called for the attention of the U.S. Capitol Police and the FBI, urging them to investigate what they perceived as a potential threat to Senator Tuberville’s life.
Hayden’s Controversial History
Michael Hayden’s history of making controversial statements and his previous characterization of Republicans as “nihilistic, dangerous, and contemptible” came under scrutiny, further amplifying the criticism.
Reactions from Political Commentators
Prominent political commentators and media figures weighed in on the controversy, emphasizing the seriousness of Hayden’s remark and the need for civil discourse in political discussions.
One Commenter’s Statement
Gregg Re of the Daily Wire wrote, “Former CIA director Hayden (torture enthusiast and left-wing hero) is seen here wishing for the death of a sitting U.S. senator, Tommy Tuberville.”
Another Comment
Federalist editor-in-chief Mollie Hemingway wrote, “Former CIA Director Michael Hayden calls for the assassination of Sen. Tuberville because the senator is performing desperately needed oversight of the U.S. Military. Hayden, a renowned civil liberties violator, promoted the Biden laptop coverup and the Russia collusion scam.”
Tuberville’s Response
Senator Tuberville released a statement in response to Hayden’s comment, “This morning, my office was made aware of a statement made by General Michael Hayden calling for a politically motivated assassination. This statement is disgusting, and it is repugnant to everything we believe in as Americans.”
Tuberville’s Call for Legal Action
Tuberville went further by suggesting that Hayden’s comment could potentially constitute a serious crime and that if the justice system remains nonpolitical, Hayden should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Challenges in the Justice System
Tuberville’s reference to the potential politicization of the justice system raised questions about applying justice in various high-profile cases.
Report to the Capitol Police
Tuberville’s office reportedly reported the incident to the Capitol Police, underlining the seriousness with which they viewed Hayden’s remark.
Tuberville’s Critique of Hayden’s Record
In addition to the recent controversy, Senator Tuberville critiqued Michael Hayden’s past, highlighting his involvement in historical intelligence failures and controversies.
The post Calls for FBI and Capitol Police to Investigate Hayden’s Comments on Tuberville first appeared on Wealthy Living.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / lev radin. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.